It works together with the L1 and L2 cache to improve computer performance by preventing bottlenecks due to the fetch and execute cycle taking too long. The L3 cache feeds information to the L2 cache, which then forwards information to the L1 cache. Typically, its memory performance is slower compared to L2 cache, but is still faster than the main memory RAM.
The L3 cache is usually built onto the motherboard between the main memory RAM and the L1 and L2 caches of the processor module. This serves as another bridge to park information like processor commands and frequently used data in order to prevent bottlenecks resulting from the fetching of these data from the main memory. In short, the L3 cache of today is what the L2 cache was before it got built-in within the processor module itself. If it does not find this info in L1 it looks to L2 then to L3, the biggest yet slowest in the group.
The purpose of the L3 differs depending on the design of the CPU. In some cases the L3 holds copies of instructions frequently used by multiple cores that share it. By: Justin Stoltzfus Contributor, Reviewer. The CPU works many times faster than system RAM, so to cut down on delays, L1 cache has bits of data at the ready that it anticipates will be needed.
L1 cache is very small, which allows it to be very fast. With each cache miss it looks to the next level of cache. L3 cache can then remove that line of instructions since it now resides in another cache referred to as exclusive cache , or it might hang on to a copy referred to as inclusive cache , depending on the design of the CPU. Each core has its own L1 and L2 caches, but the cores share a common L3 cache. Happy with that? Good -- because it's going to get a lot more complicated from here on!
As we discussed, cache is needed because there isn't a magical storage system that can keep up with the data demands of the logic units in a processor. Modern CPUs and graphics processors contain a number of SRAM blocks, that are internally organized into a hierarchy -- a sequence of caches that are ordered as follows:.
In the above image, the CPU is represented by the black dashed rectangle. The ALUs arithmetic logic units are at the far left; these are the structures that power the processor, handling the math the chip does. While its technically not cache, the nearest level of memory to the ALUs are the registers they're grouped together into a register file. Each one of these holds a single number, such as a bit integer; the value itself might be a piece of data about something, a code for a specific instruction, or the memory address of some other data.
The register file in a desktop CPU is quite small -- for example, in Intel's Core iK , there are two banks of them in each core, and the one for integers contains just bit registers. The other register file, for vectors small arrays of numbers , has bit entries.
So the total register file for each core is a little under 7 kB. But they're not designed to hold very much data just a single piece of it , which is why there's always some larger blocks of memory nearby: this is the Level 1 cache. Intel Skylake CPU, zoomed in shot of a single core.
Source: Wikichip. The above image is a zoomed in shot of a single core from Intel's Skylake desktop processor design. The ALUs and the register files can be seen in the far left, highlighted in green. In the top-middle of the picture, in white, is the Level 1 Data cache. This doesn't hold much information, just 32 kB, but like registers, it's very close to the logic units and runs at the same speed as them.
The other white rectangle indicates the Level 1 Instruction cache, also 32 kB in size. There's a cache for them, too, and you could class it as Level 0, as it's smaller only holding 1, operations and closer than the L1 caches. You might be wondering why these blocks of SRAM are so small; why aren't they a megabyte in size? Together, the data and instruction caches take up almost the same amount of space in the chip as the main logic units do, so making them larger would increase the overall size of the die.
But the main reason why they just hold a few kB, is that the time needed to find and retrieve data increases as memory capacity gets bigger. L1 cache needs to be really quick, and so a compromise must be reached, between size and speed -- at best, it takes around 5 clock cycles longer for floating point values to get the data out of this cache, ready for use. But if this was the only cache inside a processor, then its performance would hit a sudden wall.
This is why they all have another level of memory built into the cores: the Level 2 cache. This is a general block of storage, holding onto instructions and data. It's always quite a bit larger than Level 1: AMD Zen 2 processors pack up to kB, so the lower level caches can be kept well supplied.
This extra size comes at a cost, though, and it takes roughly twice as long to find and transfer the data from this cache, compared to Level 1. Going back in time, to the days of the original Intel Pentium, Level 2 cache was a separate chip, either on a small plug-in circuit board like a RAM DIMM or built into the main motherboard.
This development was soon followed by another level of cache, there to support the other lower levels, and it came about due to the rise of multi-core chips. Intel Kaby Lake chip. This image, of an Intel Kaby Lake chip, shows 4 cores in the left-middle an integrated GPU takes up almost half of the die, on the right.
Each core has its own 'private' set of Level 1 and 2 caches white and yellow highlights , but they also come with a third set of SRAM blocks. Level 3 cache, even though it is directly around a single core, is fully shared with the others -- each one can freely access the contents of another's L3 cache. It's much larger between 2 and 32 MB but also a lot slower, averaging over 30 cycles, especially if a core needs to use data that's in a block of cache some distance away.
Source: Fritzchens Fritz. Wait a second. How can 32 kB take up more physical space than kB? If Level 1 holds so little data, why is it proportionally so much bigger than L2 or L3 cache?
0コメント